Sentencing Disparities and the Gender Gap in Justice

-

We live in a nation that claims “equal justice under law,” but the data tells a different story.

If you’re a man—especially a Black man—you’re entering the courtroom with a sentence already halfway written. If you’re a woman, particularly white and perceived as vulnerable, the system slows down. It tilts. It hesitates.


This isn’t about conspiracy. It’s about culture.

This isn’t misogyny. It’s reality.

And it’s time we stop ignoring the facts.


Let’s Talk Numbers


The U.S. Sentencing Commission—the federal body responsible for tracking criminal sentencing patterns—has laid it all bare:

  • Men receive sentences that are, on average, 63% longer than women convicted of the same crimes.

  • Women are twice as likely to avoid incarceration entirely when compared to men convicted of similar offenses.

  • Men are far more likely to receive mandatory minimums, even when judges have discretion.

  • Prosecutors are more likely to offer plea deals to women that reduce or drop charges altogether.


Now pause and ask yourself this:

If these stats were reversed, if women were being sentenced 63% longer than men, would it be acceptable? Would it be dismissed as “just how it is”?


No. It would be called injustice.

So why isn’t it called that now?


The Gendered Compassion Gap


Let’s break it down even further.


When a woman appears in court, she’s often portrayed as:

  • A mother

  • A victim

  • A caregiver

  • A woman who “lost her way”


These characteristics become bargaining chips. They buy leniency. They soften judges. They reframe her as someone who needs help—not punishment.


But men?

We don’t get that benefit.


We’re labeled:

  • Predators

  • Career criminals

  • Irredeemable

  • Aggressive

  • “A danger to the community”


Where’s the room for context? For trauma? For second chances?


If justice is supposed to be blind, then why is it reading gender with perfect clarity?


Courtrooms Are Not Neutral Spaces


I’ve been in these courtrooms. I’ve seen the difference with my own eyes.


A young white woman stands before a judge, convicted of fraud, crying as her lawyer reads letters from her church, her school, her family. The judge speaks softly. He says things like:


“I believe you have a future. I want to give you a chance.”


A young Black man—same charge, same age, same circumstances—gets told:


“You’re a risk. I have to protect the community.”


That’s not justice. That’s cultural theater.

It’s not about who you are. It’s about who the court thinks you are.


And this double standard is deadly.


A Case Study: Colorado DOC


Inside the Colorado Department of Corrections, the gender gap is visible not just in sentencing—but in every layer of discipline:

  • A man can lose his phone for six months. A woman? 48 hours max.

  • A man placed in segregation can be stripped of all property for 30 days. A woman in segregation retains her property.

  • Women have more access to mental health advocacy, program flexibility, and in some cases, shorter pathways to parole.


You might think this is because women face different challenges. Maybe. But what’s undeniable is that men’s humanity is treated as optional.


We are presumed to be predators. And predators don’t get pity.


Race, Gender, and Class: The Triple Bias


Now layer this with race. Add class. And you’ll see the full horror.


A white woman from the suburbs with a pill addiction is seen as “troubled.”

A Black man from the projects with the same addiction is seen as “a threat.”

One gets treatment. The other gets time.


And society accepts this. Why? Because it feels natural. We’ve been programmed to believe women are more fragile, more innocent, more in need of protection—even when they commit the same crimes as men.


That’s not equity. That’s bias, institutionalized and operationalized.


What We’re Really Saying When We Soften Sentences for Women


We’re saying:

  • Women are less dangerous.

  • Women are less responsible.

  • Women are less capable of criminal intent.


But if women are truly equal, shouldn’t they be equally accountable?


Again, this isn’t about punishing women more harshly. It’s about forcing the system to stop over-punishing men. Especially poor men. Especially Black men. Especially those of us who were never given the benefit of the doubt.


Justice Without Gender: A Radical Proposal


What would it look like if courts, correctional systems, and public opinion actually treated crime by the crime—not the gender of the accused?


It would look like:

  • Balanced sentencing guidelines

  • Compassion extended to all people, not just women

  • Judges untrained in unconscious gender bias

  • Media coverage that reports facts—not emotional projections

  • A legal system that recognizes every person’s humanity


We’d stop saying, “She didn’t mean it,” and start asking, “Why don’t we ask if he didn’t mean it?”


We’d stop handing out mercy based on identity—and start building it into the foundation of the system.


Because justice that favors one gender over another is not justice at all. It’s favoritism. It’s discrimination. It’s the same old oppression, just dressed in a different robe.


And I’m not here for that.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Lawyer Fell Asleep During Trial—And the Justice System Let It Happen

-
Image
  By Chaddrick Thomas In the fall of 2003, I sat in a federal courtroom in Tampa, Florida, on trial for bank robbery. It was United States v. Chaddrick Thomas, Bobby Lamar Albritton, and James Range. Three of us on trial. Four former co-defendants turned government witnesses: Scotty Carpenter, David Vicker, Ava Jackson, and Nene Burns. The odds were already stacked. But nothing—nothing—could have prepared me for what happened next. My court-appointed attorney, Thomas Ostrander, fell asleep during trial. Repeatedly. Not Just a Quick Nap—He Was Snoring He didn’t doze off for a second. He wasn’t just tired. He slept. Hard. He snored in open court. He missed witness testimony. He missed cross-examinations. He missed pieces of my life being carved away one statement at a time. At one point, I nudged him awake and he jumped up shouting, “No questions for the witness, Your Honor!” But there was no one on the stand. The U.S. Marshal, Lisa Alphonso, saw it. The Court Security Officer saw it...
Read more

The Church That Never Let Go:

-
Image
  A Love Letter to Antioch Missionary Baptist Church By Chaddrick Thomas There’s a scripture in Proverbs that says, “A friend loves at all times, and a brother is born for adversity” (Proverbs 17:17). After more than two decades in prison, I can tell you with every fiber of my being that these words are not just poetry—they’re a living truth. For me, that truth has a name. It’s not just an idea or a concept. It’s a place. A people. A home. That truth is Antioch Missionary Baptist Church in Plant City, Florida. I grew up in the pews of that little church on Horton Road. I sang in the choir, my voice cracking as a young boy trying to keep up with the seasoned saints. I didn’t know then what that church would come to mean to me. Back then, church was just Sunday tradition. It was fried chicken after service, choir rehearsal during the week, and Vacation Bible School in the summer. But now, as I sit in a cell surrounded by concrete and steel, I realize something I didn’t see befor...
Read more

“Survival for Sale: How Colorado’s Prison System Turned Human Needs into Behavioral Currency”

-
Image
  By Chaddrick Thomas When you think of prison incentives, you might imagine rewards: extra phone time, a bonus commissary item, maybe early access to rec. But in Colorado, incentives don’t enhance your life. They determine whether or not you survive it. This isn’t a system built on growth. It’s built on control. And the DOC’s weapon of choice? Necessity. The Bait-and-Starve Blueprint Let’s be clear: nothing about this is accidental. Years ago, incarcerated people across Colorado’s prisons had access to basic, humane standards of living: Decent food with some variety and nutrition Mattresses that didn’t destroy your spine Educational programs that were hard-earned but fairly accessible A basic expectation of medical care—even if flawed Then came the Incentive Pod system. Quietly, strategically, and systematically, the Department began to strip these essentials from general population units. Food quality declined. Mattresses were replaced with glorified g...
Read more