The Feminine Exception: Why Female Criminality Is Softened by Society
By Chaddrick Thomas
Criminal Justice Reform Advocate
Let’s get uncomfortable.
When a man commits a violent crime, the outrage is immediate, visceral, and unforgiving. He’s labeled a monster, a predator, an irredeemable threat to society. But when a woman commits the same act, society hesitates. Suddenly, we ask why. We look for trauma. We assume she was pressured. We soften.
This is what sociologists call the “chivalry hypothesis”—the idea that women are treated more leniently by the criminal justice system not because of fairness, but because of deeply rooted gender stereotypes. Women are seen as emotional, fragile, passive, and—most importantly—less responsible for their actions.
The truth? That’s not justice. That’s gendered mythology dressed in legal robes.
I’m writing this not to demonize women or diminish the real issues they face. I’m writing this to highlight a dangerous inconsistency: if we can find grace, empathy, and second chances for women—why can’t we do the same for men?
Different Crimes, Different Narratives
Let’s take domestic violence as a case study. A man beating a woman on camera causes instant uproar—and rightfully so. It should. But flip the roles, and a disturbing pattern emerges: laughter. Viral clips of women hitting men are met with jokes, applause, and memes. We say, “He must’ve done something.” We ask what he said to “deserve it.”
That’s not equality. That’s gendered absolution.
We don’t see women as capable of cruelty. Instead, we blame the man—even when he’s the one bleeding.
Who’s Really Behind the Crime?
When a woman is arrested for robbery, fraud, or even murder, the next question is always the same:
“What man manipulated her into doing it?”
The idea that a woman could act independently—even criminally—is rejected on instinct. This reflex reveals how society infantilizes women while demonizing men. We assume women are merely caught in a man’s web. We assume men are the web.
That assumption doesn’t just affect the public. It affects judges, juries, parole boards, and policy.
Inside the System: Gendered Discipline
Even inside prison, the gap is glaring. Let me give you a concrete example from the Colorado Department of Corrections, where I’m currently incarcerated.
According to the CDOC Code of Penal Discipline:
A male inmate can lose his phone privileges for six months.
A female inmate? No more than 48 hours.
Women in segregation often keep their personal property.
Men? Stripped of everything, sometimes for 30 days or more.
These policies aren’t just bureaucratic. They reflect how the system fears men and forgives women. And that disparity reinforces the exact social bias we see in courtrooms and communities every day.
What This Says About Us
I’m not asking for women to be treated more harshly. I’m asking why men are treated as if we are inherently more dangerous, less human, less worthy of compassion.
If society can recognize context, trauma, and redemption in a woman’s case—then it has the capacity to do the same for everyone. It just chooses not to.
And that’s the real indictment.
A Broader Truth About “Justified” Violence
This isn’t just about gender. Look at how we excuse violence when it comes from uniforms or corporate boardrooms:
A police officer shoots an unarmed man and it’s called “a split-second decision.”
A military drone strike kills civilians and it’s called “collateral damage.”
A company knowingly sells a dangerous product, and the deaths that follow? “Unfortunate side effects.”
But if a Black man pulls the trigger in a neighborhood that’s been stripped of opportunity, he’s a cold-blooded killer—not a symptom of structural violence.
So let’s stop pretending this is about safety or justice.
It’s about who society feels deserves understanding.
Toward a Justice System Without Gendered Bias
This blog is just the beginning. I’m building toward a larger body of work—a book that will challenge the narratives that uphold unequal justice. My mission is simple:
To prove that our legal system is not only flawed—but willfully biased.
To expose how society extends humanity selectively.
And to advocate for a system that gives every person the chance to be seen as a whole human being—not just a stereotype.
Because if women can be seen as complex, hurt, or misled—then so can men.
Justice doesn’t have a gender.
But until we act like it, I’ll keep writing.


Comments
Post a Comment